Code security focuses on preventing security breaches before they occur by implementing robust measures during the development process.
In case of potential threats, code security practices cover mechanisms to detect anomalies, unauthorized access, or malicious activities countered by unknown resources. Learn more about Threat detection here.
A well-secured codebase has response mechanisms put in place to address and mitigate security mishaps proficiently.
As we always say; Security is not a set-and-forget practice. Code security is also an ongoing process, with regular updates, patches, and improvements to adapt to emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
SAST tools hold a database of all the known vulnerabilities which gets compared against your code. Although looks like static typography these are focused more on security best practices. SAST tools scan code at different stages of SDLC and are also easy to integrate with your IDEs and CI/CD pipelines such as detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities. Before adopting any SAST tool, make sure it supports the programming language your organization is using.
Unlike SAST, DAST also uses a database of known vulnerabilities. However, DAST solutions are more inclined to the runtime behavior of your application and not necessarily on code. DAST solutions are slightly slower than SAST, as they include application execution. DAST tools are not tied to any specific programming language.
With the rise in AI and other Large Language Models (LLMs), automated code review is getting popular to ensure code security. In the case of LLMs, users need to be very clear about what they are asking and what exactly they want to build. Once you bridge this gap between “Clear thought and Clear ask” LLMs are used as a good starting point for your automated code review process.
Frameworks provide a ready-made structure and tools that help engineering teams to build software much easier. New and emerging technologies also include built-in security features and practices saving developers time by including necessary security practices.
Too many security tools can be overwhelming. Select a tool that satisfies your needs including other security aspects rather than just code. Integrating such a tool into your development lifecycle improves your overall security posture.
Even if it sounds like security is a separate task, it should not be. With continuous training and awareness, developers get into the habit of secure coding practices.
Businesses cannot compromise on time and slow down their SDLC when embedding security. Having dedicated security teams, periodic training, encouraging developers to point out security flaws, and timely remediations are some of the ways speed and functionality can also be achieved with a secure SDLC environment.
As we said before; Security is not a SET and FORGET practice. As technology evolves, so does their security appetite, including the number of possible attack vectors. To keep up with such a rapidly changing landscape, developers should stay up-to-date with the latest threats and best practices.