This principle focuses on the need for constant authentication and authorization checks. As said earlier, No user or device should be trusted by default, regardless of the location, authoritativeness, or previous verification. Security controls should continuously validate access requests throughout a session, ensuring the user or device requesting access still has the appropriate permissions.
Zero Trust adheres to the principle of least privilege. Users and devices are only given access to resources with the least permissions required to perform their tasks. This reduces the risk of possible threats in case of a breach by limiting the attacker’s ability to move within the system and access unauthorized resources.
Just like the users, devices are also given controlled access within the zero-trust environment. This involves managing and authenticating devices before they are granted organizational resources. Measures like device registration, posture checks, and endpoint security controls can be implemented to ensure that only authorized and secure devices can connect to the network.
In the zero-trust architecture, networks are segmented into smaller and more secure zones. Microsegmentation creates a logical barrier between different parts of the network which results in reducing the radius of a potential breach. This ensures that even if an attacker gains access to one network segment, it cannot move freely into the entire network.
Deny All Default is nothing but a similar concept shared in the beginning “Never Trust, Verify All”. In this, access to all the resources is denied by default, and only explicitly authorized users and devices with necessary permissions are given access. This proactive approach minimizes the risk of unauthorized access and ensures a more secure environment.
Below are the 6 benefits organizations can achieve through carefully following and implementing zero trust security architecture.
Controlled and verified access equals reduced attack surface! Zero Trust reduces the potential to damage resources caused due to a breach by constantly verifying access and minimizing trust. Even if an attacker gains access to a specific resource, it is likely be blocked from reaching other sensitive regions due to a lack of necessary permissions.
Recently after the pandemic, a significant portion of the workforce is operating remotely. Zero Trust is well-suited for such cases where the need is to secure access regardless of the user's location. Since it focuses on verifying users and devices themselves, rather than relying solely on network location, it provides a secure way to grant access to authorized personnel working remotely.
As we said above, Zero trust adheres to the principle of least privilege. It means that users and devices are only given the minimum level of access required to complete given tasks. This granular control makes it challenging and almost impossible for attackers to exploit credentials or move laterally within the network if they gain access to a single account.
Zero Trust focuses on securing access to specific resources rather than granting full access to the entire network. This approach significantly reduces data exploitation. By limiting access to users and devices with the appropriate permissions, zero trust minimizes the risk of unauthorized data exfiltration or accidental data breaches.
While Zero Trust implementation might require initial planning. In the longer run, it can ultimately simplify security management. Zero Trust can streamline security processes and reduce administrative control for security teams by centralizing access control policies and leveraging automation for verification tasks.
Organizations need to follow many data security regulations to implement strong access controls and protective measures. A well-designed Zero Trust architecture can help organizations adhere to these compliance requirements by demonstrating a rigorous approach to user and device authentication, authorization, and data access control.